Wells Fargo Auto Loan Insurance Lawsuit

Wells Fargo Auto Loan Insurance Lawsuit

  • The Fee Is Free Unless You Win®.
  • America's Largest Injury Law Firm™
  • Protecting Families Since 1988
  • 20 Billion+ Won
  • 1,000+ Lawyers Nationwide

ANNOUNCEMENT

We are no longer accepting any claims for this case.
Our results speak for themselves

The attorneys featured above are licensed in Florida. For a full list of attorneys in your state please visit our attorney page.

Wells Fargo Auto Loan Insurance Lawsuit

An internal Wells Fargo report said the bank could owe consumers at least $80 million, although at least one analyst has said the lawsuits could end up costing Wells Fargo "multiples more" than that, according to Fortune.

The expense of the unnecessary auto insurance forced about 274,000 of the bank’s customers into delinquency and caused nearly 25,000 wrongful vehicle repossessions, the Times said, citing the 60-page internal Wells Fargo report.

An internal Wells Fargo report said the bank could owe consumers at least $80 million, although at least one analyst has said the lawsuits could end up costing Wells Fargo "multiples more" than that.

A Wells Fargo spokesperson acknowledged to the Times that the questionable insurance practices took place, but contested the numbers.

Scroll down for more
FAQ

Get answers to commonly asked questions about our legal services and learn how we may assist you with your case.

Morgan & Morgan

  • Wells Fargo Auto Loan Insurance: Required but Unnecessary?

    The internal report highlighted a big problem with the insurance: Many customers were charged for auto insurance, even though they already had their own, cheaper policies. The Wells Fargo-backed policies could cost as much as $1,000 per year, plus interest if people didn’t pay up front, the Times says. Wells Fargo earned a commission on the premiums, according to the Times.

    Many customers were charged for auto insurance, even though they already had their own, cheaper policies.

    Wells Fargo’s insurance requirement is called “lender-placed insurance,” which means that the bank or other lender requires and applies a specific insurance policy on loans their customers take out. This is common for certain loans, such as mortgages, but it’s rarer for motor vehicle loans.

    The Wells Fargo insurance requirement in question involved insurance policies underwritten by National General Insurance and sold by Wells Fargo insuring customers’ vehicles between January 2012 and July 2016. The policies included features like collision coverage, which consumers often already had purchased on their own.

    How it was supposed to work, according to the Times: When a customer got a car loan with Wells Fargo, that person’s information would go to National General, which should have used a database to determine if the customer already had insurance coverage. If not, National General would automatically add the coverage to the customers’ accounts.

    However, the procedure wasn’t flawless, especially if the redundancies slipped under consumers’ radars because their payments were automatically deducted from their accounts. The issues went beyond that, though.

  • What Happens When Insurance Doesn’t Protect You?

    There were a couple major issues associated with the way Wells Fargo handled the mandatory insurance for the bank’s auto loan borrowers.

    One type of complaint centered on a customer who had proved to Wells Fargo that his or her car was already insured, but the bank demanded payment for its lender-placed insurance anyway, according to the Times.

    For one thing, some customers didn’t even realize they were required to pay for insurance until they saw the deduction on their accounts.

    This violates some state insurance regulations that mandate notification. Nearly 100,000 of the Wells Fargo auto insurance policies violated the disclosure requirements of Arkansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Washington, according to the Times.

    The lack of notification triggered some customers into becoming delinquent with payments, according to the Times. If customers agreed to a monthly deduction, plus interest, of $300, but then insurance was later added, the unexpected increase could derail a customer’s budget, according to the Times. Problems with payment ultimately led to repossession of tens of thousands of customers’ motor vehicles, for which the report says Wells Fargo would charge as much as $500 for a reinstatement fee.

  • A Familiar Auto Insurance Problem from a Bank with a History of Problems

    For years, consumers have filed complaints about banks’ lender-placed insurance on car loans, the Times says, noting that Wells Fargo’s name routinely came up in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau data.

    One type of complaint centered on a customer who had proved to Wells Fargo that his or her car was already insured, but the bank demanded payment for its lender-placed insurance anyway, according to the Times. A similar thing happened to a California man who recently filed a lawsuit over Wells Fargo's auto loan insurance practices.

    The news about the insurance scandal comes at a time when Wells Fargo, one of the largest banks in the United States, is already under scrutiny for allegedly modifying the home loans of customers going through bankruptcy and for its employees creating thousands of credit card and bank accounts in customers’ names without those customers’ consent.

Scroll down for more Load More

How it works

It's easy to get started.
The Fee Is Free Unless You Win®.

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

  • Step 1

    Submit
    your claim

    With a free case evaluation, submitting your case is easy with Morgan & Morgan.

  • Step 2

    We take
    action

    Our dedicated team gets to work investigating your claim.

  • Step 3

    We fight
    for you

    If we take on the case, our team fights to get you the results you deserve.

Settlement

$40,000,000

Customer Story

“I was in a difficult situation when I was injured by a faulty product. I was hesitant to seek legal help but with the help of Morgan & Morgan, they made the process easy. They took immediate action and got me the compensation I deserved. I couldn't have done it without them. I highly recommend their services.” Estate of Patricia Allen v. RJ Reynolds, et al. | 2014

Client success
stories that inspire and drive change

Explore over 55,000 5-star reviews and 800 client testimonials to discover why people trust Morgan & Morgan.

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. Based on Select nationwide reviews

  • Video thumbnail for 5l3q2e67j8
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for yfe952tcop
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for z1bqwg9hkl
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for s5nb3hnvkv
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for t4elibxene
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for 5nr9efxqj3
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for e8s1x6u5jp
    Wistia video play button