Smith and Nephew Hip Liner

Smith and Nephew Hip Liner Recall

  • The Fee Is Free Unless You Win®.
  • America's Largest Injury Law Firm™
  • Protecting Families Since 1988
  • 20 Billion+ Won
  • 1,000+ Lawyers Nationwide

Free Case Evaluation

Tell us about your situation so we can get started fighting for you. We tailor each case to meet our clients' needs.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Our results speak for themselves

The attorneys featured above are licensed in Florida. For a full list of attorneys in your state please visit our attorney page.

Smith and Nephew Hip Liner Recall

Smith and Nephew PLC has recalled a metal liner used in its R3 Acetabular System after patients reported infections, fractures and dislocations. In issuing the recall, the company stated that it was not satisfied with the clinical results of the component, with one spokesman reporting that an uptick in revisionary surgeries prompted the action. Approximately 7700 patients have been implanted with hip implants using the now-recalled metal liners.

In light of this recall, our attorneys reviewed injury claims on behalf of patients who were implanted with the R3 Acetabular System using this metal liner. Potentially, these individuals may be able to seek compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering and other losses associated with their hip implant.

Hip Implants and Metallosis

A number of metal-on-metal hip implants have reportedly been linked to metallosis, a type of poisoning caused by the release of metal debris into the body. A spokeswoman for Smith and Nephew claimed that metallosis was not among the problems which necessitated the recall of the metal liner. It has been alleged that the company may have been too quick to discount metallosis as the cause of the patients’ injuries, as a number of metal-on-metal hip implants have been linked to this dangerous condition.

DePuy’s recalled ASR hips and several other devices have been linked to metallosis, which occurs when the metal components of the devices rub against each other, releasing metallic ions as they wear. The body can develop a severe inflammatory response to the debris, resulting in muscle and soft tissue damage. Metallosis is of particular concern because such damage can compromise revision surgery. In addition, extreme levels of cobalt can result in a number of problems, including but not limited to the following:

  • Optic nerve damage
  • Headaches
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Convulsions
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Blindness
  • Vertigo
  • Deafness
  • Tinnitus
Scroll down for more

Get answers to commonly asked questions about our legal services and learn how we may assist you with your case.

Smith and Nephew Hip Liner Recall FAQs

  • Eligibility for Lawsuit against Smith and Nephew

    Faced with mounting concerns over the safety of metal-on-metal hip implants, the FDA announced in March 2012 that it would schedule a two-day review of the devices gathering input from scientists, doctors, patients and researchers to determine whether new standards should be issued for these types of hip implants. Johnson & Johnson’s DePuy Unit, Stryker Corp; and other metal-on-metal hip implant manufacturers have already been hit with thousands of lawsuits from patients who claim they suffered metallosis or other injuries from the devices.

    Our attorneys are not currently taking claims for this class action case.

Scroll down for more Load More

How it works

It's easy to get started.
The Fee Is Free Unless You Win®.

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

  • Step 1

    your claim

    With a free case evaluation, submitting your case is easy with Morgan & Morgan.

  • Step 2

    We take

    Our dedicated team gets to work investigating your claim.

  • Step 3

    We fight
    for you

    If we take on the case, our team fights to get you the results you deserve.



Customer Story

“I was in a difficult situation when I was injured by a faulty product. I was hesitant to seek legal help but with the help of Morgan & Morgan, they made the process easy. They took immediate action and got me the compensation I deserved. I couldn't have done it without them. I highly recommend their services.” Estate of Patricia Allen v. RJ Reynolds, et al. | 2014

Client success
stories that inspire and drive change

Explore over 55,000 5-star reviews and 800 client testimonials to discover why people trust Morgan & Morgan.

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. Based on Select nationwide reviews

  • Video thumbnail for 5l3q2e67j8
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for yfe952tcop
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for z1bqwg9hkl
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for s5nb3hnvkv
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for t4elibxene
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for 5nr9efxqj3
    Wistia video play button
  • Video thumbnail for e8s1x6u5jp
    Wistia video play button