Meet Our Olympus Endoscope Lawsuit Lawyers

An Olympus endoscope lawsuit is a legal claim alleging that an Olympus endoscope or related medical device caused or contributed to a patient's injuries.

Some lawsuits involve allegations that reusable duodenoscopes were defectively designed or inadequately labeled, allowing dangerous bacteria to remain inside the devices despite recommended cleaning and sterilizing procedures.

Patients who developed serious infections following procedures involving these devices may be able to pursue compensation if evidence supports a connection between the device and their injuries.

An endoscope is a medical instrument used to examine or treat areas inside the body. A duodenoscope is a specialized type of endoscope commonly used during ERCP procedures to access the bile and pancreatic ducts.

Duodenoscopes have complex components, including an elevator mechanism that helps guide medical instruments during procedures. These features can make the devices more challenging to clean and disinfect between patients.

Contaminated endoscopes have been associated with the transmission of bacteria, including certain antibiotic-resistant organisms.

Potential infections include VRE, infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and other serious bacterial infections.

In severe cases, infections can progress to bloodstream infections, sepsis, septic shock, or organ failure.

However, developing an infection after an endoscopic procedure does not automatically establish that the endoscope caused it.

Yes. Olympus has issued recalls and safety corrections involving certain endoscopes and related accessories.

For example, the FDA classified a recall involving the Olympus MAJ-891 endoscope accessory as Class I in 2025 because of concerns involving contamination and infection risks.

Not every Olympus endoscope has been recalled, and different recalls may involve different devices, safety concerns, and corrective actions.

Patients who are unsure which device was used during their procedure may be able to obtain that information through their medical records.

You may have legal options if you developed a serious infection following an ERCP procedure and evidence suggests that a contaminated or defective medical device contributed to your injuries.

An attorney can review your medical records, investigate the equipment used during the procedure, and evaluate whether a manufacturer, healthcare provider, or another party may be legally responsible.

The availability of a claim depends on the circumstances, supporting evidence, and applicable law.

The time available to file a lawsuit depends on the state, the type of legal claim, and the circumstances surrounding the injury.

Different deadlines may apply to product liability, medical malpractice, and wrongful death claims. Certain exceptions or special rules may also affect when a filing deadline begins or expires.

Because missing an applicable deadline can prevent you from pursuing compensation, it is important to speak with an attorney as soon as possible.

Medical device lawsuits can involve complex medical evidence, product design questions, infection histories, and disputes over whether a device caused a patient's injuries.

As America’s Largest Injury Law Firm™, with more than 1,100 lawyers nationwide, $35 billion recovered, and 35 years of experience, Morgan & Morgan has the resources to investigate serious medical device claims and pursue compensation from responsible parties.

Our attorneys can review medical records, investigate potential product defects, consult qualified experts, and help patients and families understand their legal options.

We believe everyone deserves access to excellent legal representation, regardless of their financial situation. That's why we offer free case evaluations, and with our contingency fee arrangement, you don't pay attorney's fees unless we win your case. The Fee is Free®.

Take our free case evaluation today to learn how we may be able to help.