SVG
Courthouse Icon
$15,000
Pre-Trial Offer
$500,000
Our Results

Taylor Benoist v. Titan Medical Manufacturing

Verdict
Labor

Who

Taylor Benoist v. Titan Medical Manufacturing

What

Labor

When

2021

Where

TN

Summary 

Our attorneys recovered $500,000 in punitive and emotional suffering damages for a client who was retaliated against after attempting to report a sexual harassment incident.

Case Study 

Morgan & Morgan represented a woman who, after attempting to report a sexual harassment incident at their workplace, was retaliated against by their employer. Not only did they marginalize her complaints, but they utilized tactics of intimidation, wrote her up for disciplinary action, and created a hostile work environment in an attempt to silence the client’s experience. Realizing that negotiation wasn't possible, she turned to a firm she could trust to assist her in one of the most traumatic moments of her life. Our attorneys worked with her case and successfully reached a $500,000 settlement for compensatory and punitive damages, finding that the company acted with “malice and reckless disregard” for the client’s rights.

Case Synopsis

Who

Taylor Benoist v. Titan Medical Manufacturing

What

Labor

When

2021

Where

TN

Summary 

Our attorneys recovered $500,000 in punitive and emotional suffering damages for a client who was retaliated against after attempting to report a sexual harassment incident.

Case Study 

Morgan & Morgan represented a woman who, after attempting to report a sexual harassment incident at their workplace, was retaliated against by their employer. Not only did they marginalize her complaints, but they utilized tactics of intimidation, wrote her up for disciplinary action, and created a hostile work environment in an attempt to silence the client’s experience. Realizing that negotiation wasn't possible, she turned to a firm she could trust to assist her in one of the most traumatic moments of her life. Our attorneys worked with her case and successfully reached a $500,000 settlement for compensatory and punitive damages, finding that the company acted with “malice and reckless disregard” for the client’s rights.

Injury Summary

Relevant Practice Areas

Print icon

Share This Case